headerdrawing1.jpg (96365 bytes)

Sulphuric Acid on the WebTM Technical Manual DKL Engineering, Inc.

Knowledge for the Sulphuric Acid Industry Line.jpg (1139 bytes)

Sulphuric Acid on the Web

Introduction
General
Equipment Suppliers
Contractor

Instrumentation
Industry News
Maintenance
Acid Traders
Organizations
Fabricators
Conferences

Used Plants
Intellectual Propoerty
Acid Plant Database
Market Information
Library

Technical Manual

Introduction
General

Definitions
Instrumentation
Plant Safety
Metallurgial Processes
Metallurgical
Sulphur Burning
Acid Regeneration
Lead Chamber
Technology
Gas Cleaning
Contact
Strong Acid
Acid Storage
Loading/Unloading

Transportation
Sulphur Systems
Liquid SO2
Boiler Feed Water
Steam Systems

Cooling Water
Effluent Treatment
Utilities
Construction
Maintenance
Inspection
Analytical Procedures
Materials of Construction
Corrosion
Properties
Vendor Data

DKL Engineering, Inc.

Handbook of Sulphuric Acid Manufacturing
Order Form
Preface
Contents
Feedback

Sulphuric Acid Decolourization
Order Form
Preface
Table of Contents

Process Engineering Data Sheets - PEDS
Order Form
Table of Contents

Introduction

Bibliography of Sulphuric Acid Technology
Order Form

Preface
Contents

Sulphuric Acid Plant Specifications
 

Google Search new2.gif (111 bytes)

log 2.JPG (76785 bytes)

Sharplex.jpg (28953 bytes)

MAHLEInd.jpg (21078 bytes)

 

 

Acid Plant Database August 9, 2011

Owner E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. Inc.

Dupont-Logo.gif (1153 bytes)

Location HC-66 400 Harris Road
Wurtland, Kentucky
USA   
Background -
Website www.dupont.com
Plant Fort Hill Plant
Coordinates 38° 33' 20" N, 82° 47' 21" W
Type of Plant Sulphur Burning
Gas Source Elemental Sulphur
Plant Capacity 260,000 STPA
SA/DA SA with H2O2 tail gas scrubber
Emissions SO2: 27.6 lb/ton
Acid Mist: 0.5 lb/ton
Opacity: < 20%

SO2: 248 ton (12 month rolling average)
         1.7 lb/ton (3 h rolling average)
The above emission limits are the subject of a Consent Decree which must be met by March 1, 2011

Permits Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Quality
Facility ID: 21-089-00001
Title V Air Quality Permit
Permit No. Issue Date Expiry Date Date Modified

V-03-007

-

- -

V-06-026

July 31, 2006

- -
V-06-026 Revision 1 May 5, 2007 - -
Status Operating
Year Built 1961
Technology -
Contractor -
Remarks Site also produces 4.417 ton/h of chlorosulfonic acid (CSA)
Oleum (65%) also produced on site 
2011 - December - Hydrogen peroxide tail gas scrubber installed
Pictures Du Pont - Wurtland 1.jpg (93276 bytes) 
General -
References

Brown, G.W. , McDonald, C.E.  and Martin, M.W. , "DuPont Wurtland High Performance Drying Tower Goes On-Line", Sulfuric Acid Today, Spring/Summer 2002, p. 20-21.

News July 14, 2009 - A jury has found chemical giant DuPont guilty of gross negligence in a 2004 leak at its Wurtland plant that released clouds of sulfuric acid over large portions of Greenup County.  Because of that negligence, those suing DuPont for health problems they suffered as a result of the release are entitled to 10 times the monetary damages they would have otherwise collected, the jury ruled.  The 10-member jury found in favor of the plaintiffs on Monday after deliberating for about three hours and 40 minutes. The verdict concluded a civil trial that began June 26 in U.S. District Court in Ashland.  
The lawsuit - actually a consolidation of several actions filed against DuPont following the Oct. 11, 2004, chemical release - is being tried in four phases.
While acknowledging a chemical release did take place at the Wurtland facility on the date in question, DuPont continues to maintain that release was not the cause of the problems alleged by the plaintiffs, Campbell said.  "We really don't believe our actions in the case warranted these awards," she said. We think our employees acted swiftly to stop the release and to inform the community."  A number of those suing DuPont are police officers, firefighters and other emergency personnel who responded to the scene when the leak occurred.  The leak, caused by a cracked pipe at the Wurtland facility, resulted in the release of sulfur trioxide, a chemical that formed billowing white clouds composed of droplets of sulfuric acid, which covered much of Wurtland, Worthington and Greenup.
Plaintiffs' attorneys argued failure on DuPont's part to address issues raised by a 1995 chemical release at the Wurtland plant was largely responsible for the same type of incident occurring again nine years later.  Following the 1995 incident, a safety team recommended DuPont institute a number of changes at the facility to ensure a spill of that nature never occurred again, according to testimony in the case.  "Not only did DuPont ignore those recommendations in 1995, it continued to ignore them following the 2004 spill as well," plantiffs' lawyers said in bench memorandum filed in the case. "In other words, DuPont had known for nine years it needed to improve its Wurtland facility's safety practices, but simply chose not to."  Also, testimony in the case revealed three months before the spill, a DuPont investigation revealed the tube bundle that ultimately failed was "dangerously corroded" and in need of replacement, but the company declined to do so, the memorandum states.

MTPD - Metric Tonne per Day           STPD - Short Ton per Day
MTPA - Metric Tonne per Annum      STPA - Short Ton per Annum
SA - Single Absorption
DA - Double Absorption
 

* Coordinates can be used to locate plant on Google Earth