The Roberts Company (Winterville, NC) - Fabrication and installation of equipment www.robertscompany.com
Abener LLC (St. Louis, MO) - Engineering and construction support
Trader Construction (New Bern, NC) - Civil and general contracting support
Century Contractors ( Matthews, NC) - Fabricate and install ducting/piping, modular pipe rack

Upon initial startup of Plant No. 7 combined SO₂ emissions for No. 3, 4 and 7 shall be less than 2006 tons per consecutive 12 month period

Blower: Siemens AG (KKK) w/steam turbine and IGV
HRS: with steam injection, 203,000 lb/h 50 psig steam
Control System: Honeywell DCS
Converter: 54 ft diameter
      Bed 1: XLP 220
      Bed 2: XLP 110
      Bed 3: XLP 110
      Bed 4: SCX-2000 Cs

Site Power Generation: 52 MW

Meanwhile, in a separate permitting decision involving PCS, a state administrative law judge has ruled that state air regulators erred in issuing a permit to the company to overhaul its fertilizer plant without properly notifying federal wildlife officials and that it used the wrong baseline for predicting whether the plant would harm air quality at the Swanquarter National Wildlife Refuge.  Last year, the state Division of Air Quality allowed the company to build a new sulfuric acid plant to replace two existing plants at the site near Aurora. The new plant will produce about 4,500 tons of sulfuric acid a day, 1,000 tons more than the existing facility. The acid is mixed with phosphate ore mined on site to produce phosphoric acid.  The U.S. Department of Interior challenged the permit, saying air emissions from the larger phosphate plant could harm visibility at the wildlife refuge about 20 miles east.  Judge Fred Morrison of the state Office of Administrative Hearings, ruled that the state did not properly notify the Fish & Wildlife Service, part of the Interior Department, of PCS's plans. Morrison also found state environmental regulators used too lenient a baseline for estimating whether the added pollution from the plant would harm air in the Swanquarter refuge.  The judge's decision is advisory. The state Environmental Management Commission, an appointed panel, will make the final decision, which could change the baseline that air regulators use for comparing whether added air emissions would harm air quality and visibility.